Lego Takes the Life Out of Its Own Party

20130114-191437.jpgThis past weekend, there was a Lego expo here in Portland and my youngest son went with my wife. We’ve been to these kinds of shows in the past – and they can be really exciting.

Sure, these shows have had Lego brand goods. But far more interesting are the aftermarket products – specialized figures, unique model sets created by innovative designers, amazingly innovative models created by Lego enthusiasts, Lego topical shirts for sale, etc…

Did you know you can buy aftermarket Lego figures painted with specific WWII uniforms and holding replica guns to match? Or aftermarket Halo figurines? Or rare collectible sets no longer on the market? Or unique sets creating interesting new Lego creations?

All in all – these shows have reflected an amazingly vital and engaging brand. And their variety has made parents far more interested in staying connected with Lego for their children.

Last Weekend the Lego Brand Cops Took Over. They called the show Lego KidsFest (appropriate trademarks and register symbols liberally applied).

And Lego removed all that vital brand excitement. This show was a branded Lego expo with absolute brand control. Only Lego brand kits. Only Lego brand shirts. Only Lego designer created megamodels. Yes, full size Lego Ironman is cool. But last year’s competition for “best in show” was far more interesting – especially the independent re-creation of the Lord of the Rings battle for the white city.

Saddest of all? There really wasn’t much to look at that can’t be seen at Target or the Lego store at the mall. Yawn.

Why? Why? Why? I can imagine a bunch of nice neat corporate reasons to have done what Lego did last weekend. Surely it made the legal department happy. And the strong arm application of complete brand control probably thrilled a bunch of execs. Except, building a fortress around your brand is also a good way to make it less appealing.

It’s possible Lego would respond by saying “those other shows are all still out there”. Except, not within my consideration set of shows that trickle through the Portland market. There’s only room for about 1 show a year. And the implied communication from the LegoKidFest is that the brand police are in charge and they’re taking names.

What Lego Missed by Not “Practicing on the Bandstand”. I’m not going to sit here and claim Lego will die now. What happened is a lost opportunity that could have made their future more powerful. And I wrote my last blog post around the life & excitement Miles Davis delivered by “Practicing on the Bandstand”. (Link here.) These shows have been Lego’s version of practicing on the bandstand.

That said, this isn’t entirely a minor issue. Lego hasn’t always been as healthy as it is today. Discussion of Lego’s path reminds us that “The Lego Group had lost money four out of the seven years from 1998 through 2004. Sales dropped 30 percent in 2003 and 10 percent more in 2004, when profit margins stood at –30 percent.” (Link here.) And a new block brand (Kreo) is now giving Lego brand models a run for their money that Megablocks never could.

Lego needs to remember the key to their sales success: Supportive parents & excited kids. I suppose a 4 year old won’t get much from seeing an aftermarket set that looks a lot like the Starship Enterprise. But an 8 year old will. And a 12 year old. And a 15 year old. And a 35 year old. And even this 53 year old will…who bought one last year.

When Lego is taken out of its carefully constructed brick walls, Lego takes a place in our minds that is vital and alive – ready to be quickly recalled when we need to give one of the kids in our life something that is more than just a toy.

Copyright 2013 – Doug Garnett – All Rights Reserved

About Doug Garnett
Growing retail based businesses through television, DRTV, and all forms of video. Doug is a strategist, executive producer, director, author, & teacher.

3 Responses to Lego Takes the Life Out of Its Own Party

  1. So sad! Isn’t that what most brands are trying to get their fans and followers to do? So much for engagement.

  2. Tim Oates says:

    Apple struggled to keep their brand “pure” for years and years. Today, their app store has logged $15,000,000,000 in sales.

    Lego seems to be going backwards by excluding the community that supports them – at least in enthusiasm – which is a much more painful way to learn the same lesson.

    • Doug Garnett says:

      Agreed. Allowing some of this chaotic excitement is really sweet.

      In a similar vein, I was impressed last fall when Starbucks brought their holiday inventory into stores, then left it stacked with a “Don’t Open Until…” sign on it. It added a freshness — a life & excitement — to a store that is often so tightly controlled that they risk losing a warm connection with their consumers.

      It’s always tricky knowing the boundaries – especially once the lawyers get active. But Lego could be doing far better at helping the world grow around their product.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: